Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY
Watchtower
ONLINE LIBRARY
English
  • BIBLE
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • MEETINGS
  • g82 5/8 p. 28
  • From Our Readers

No video available for this selection.

Sorry, there was an error loading the video.

  • From Our Readers
  • Awake!—1982
  • Subheadings
  • Similar Material
  • Why Babies Deformed?
  • From Our Readers
  • Why Are Some Babies Born Deformed?
    Awake!—1981
  • Why Are Some Born Handicapped?
    Awake!—1973
  • From Our Readers
    Awake!—1986
  • Training Children from Infancy
    Making Your Family Life Happy
See More
Awake!—1982
g82 5/8 p. 28

From Our Readers

Why Babies Deformed?

I just finished reading your article “Why Are Some Babies Born Deformed?” As a father of a handicapped child, let me say that it is not an easy chore to raise a handicapped child, but the rewards and joys even for the self-esteem that can be seen developing in your child far outweigh the pains. Please continue being conscious of those who are handicapped.

B. & J. B., California

As the mother of a profoundly retarded child I can’t agree with those parents who seem so desperately to grasp at straws and try to make a “blessing” out of a tragedy. A dentist once said of my little boy, “Sometimes blessings come in disguises.” I simply replied, “Nothing makes up for not having a normal child.” I know he knows I love him, but in no way are his handicaps a blessing.

A mother

In your article “Why Are Some Babies Born Deformed?” you used the word “mongolism” twice. The correct term is “Down’s Syndrome.” Dr. Langdon Down first described this syndrome about 100 years ago and it bears his name. Because of a vague resemblance in the face of such a child to the Asian races, in times past he was described as a “mongol” and therefore the old terms “mongolism” and “mongoloid.” However, it is incorrect to associate the condition with Asians, who could be offended by the term. It is considered demeaning to refer to a child as a “mongoloid.”

J. H., California

Thank you for your letter. The words in question are listed in Webster’s latest dictionary as acceptable. However, we realize that attitudes toward certain expressions change over the years and we endeavor to show proper regard for the feelings of others. Where we can use expressions that are understandable and that do not offend the sensitivities of others we try to do that. Those who feel that terms describing certain handicaps are inappropriate may find that it takes many years before customary usage changes, if it does at all, to conform to their viewpoint. In the meantime they will be greatly aided if they take into account the attitude of the speaker or writer. They will often find that it is respectful and helpful, not at all demeaning.​—ED.

From Our Readers

How I appreciate your page “From Our Readers.” It certainly proves to me that your reporting is fair and honest​—even to publishing and answering scathing criticism.

A. N., England

We enjoy the “From Our Readers” page. That you would print uncomplimentary letters shows your “broad-mindedness.”

C. & I. A., New York

I find your magazine fascinating reading. You always present a well-balanced view. I admire your firm, honest and consistent stand on religious and moral issues. Keep up the good work!

O. L., Canada

    English Publications (1950-2026)
    Log Out
    Log In
    • English
    • Share
    • Preferences
    • Copyright © 2025 Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Settings
    • JW.ORG
    • Log In
    Share