Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY
Watchtower
ONLINE LIBRARY
English
  • BIBLE
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • MEETINGS
  • g83 11/8 p. 23
  • How Accurate Are Bible Translations?

No video available for this selection.

Sorry, there was an error loading the video.

  • How Accurate Are Bible Translations?
  • Awake!—1983
  • Similar Material
  • How Reliable Is Our Bible Text?
    Awake!—1972
  • The Struggle for a More Accurate Bible Text
    The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom—1984
  • Study Number 6—The Christian Greek Text of the Holy Scriptures
    “All Scripture Is Inspired of God and Beneficial”
  • The Text of the Christian Scriptures—How Accurate?
    The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom—1977
See More
Awake!—1983
g83 11/8 p. 23

How Accurate Are Bible Translations?

Sometimes people in their ignorance say that since the original Bible manuscripts no longer exist, our Bible translations of today are unreliable. It is therefore interesting to note the following opinion of a recognized authority on the matter. In his work Auf Den Spuren Jesu (In the Footsteps of Jesus), Gerhard Kroll says the following:

“Two of the leading English text critics, B. F. Westcott and J. A. Hort, estimate the number of textual variants as being 250,000; that is, for every two words of the original text there are three textual variants. Only laymen can be terrified by this fact. According to the results of the textual critic, seven eighths of the New Testament text is unquestionable; that is, we are unable by any scientific means to give the original reading of the remaining one eighth of the text. But many of the variants of this eighth part are insignificant, because they are mere orthographical discrepancies or transpositions of words that have no effect on the sense. Deducting these, there remains only one sixtieth of the text that could be labeled as being questionable. But from this sixtieth part most of it could be considered as being irrelevant as far as the content is concerned so that only one thousandth of the entire text could be said to contain significant differences. However, out of this one-thousandth part only a few passages are important as far as doctrine is concerned. And even these are not that important inasmuch as the Biblical testimony of these respective dogmatic teachings does not depend just on this one particular uncertain passage.”

Therefore the final conclusion of this textual critic Kroll is: “In general, the scientific conviction is well established that, in essence, the textual arrangement has been preserved without error.”

    English Publications (1950-2026)
    Log Out
    Log In
    • English
    • Share
    • Preferences
    • Copyright © 2025 Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Settings
    • JW.ORG
    • Log In
    Share